Science – Religion – And The Etheric Field/Mind: Einstein made one of the most important observations that modern intellectuals neither understand, nor can they in any manner even begin to come to terms with — largely because of their politically correct cultural philosophy and their ignorance of the Laws. Einstein stated: “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.” When properly and factually understood, there is absolutely no difference between the findings of the enlightened scientist, the Apostle Paul who instructed the Gentile Christians, and the enlightened Mystic who authored the scriptures — except, perhaps, the key word enlightened. But herein lies the crux of the problem — i.e., the very word enlightened raises the crucial question as to how one even becomes enlightened? Does one go to a traditional school environment that suppresses what Einstein portrays as the forgotten intuitive gift — while programming the rational servant with what often amounts to little more than cultural and politically correct propaganda? In his own words he acknowledged that “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” In fact, what Einstein portrays as the rational servant does not even possess the necessary insight to understand both the reality of the intuitive gift, or the Great Source of Knowledge that the undeveloped intuitive resources of the mind of man has the innate potential of tapping into — which prompted Einstein to acknowledge that“We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.”
With great wisdom and vision Einstein stated “Only those who can see the invisible can do the impossible.” But since the vast majority of modern scientists reject even the existence of the invisible, it is the scientific community that has rendered itself impotent with respect to any real depth of perception and understanding. Paul conveyed the exact same message to the congregation of believers that Einstein stated in the words: “While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal” (2 Cor 4:18 KJV). And when this reality is understood for what it truly is, only then is the words of the recently discovered Gospel of Thomas comprehended where it is written: (5) Jesus said, “Recognize what is in your sight, and that which is hidden from you will become plain to you …” And while only a handful of people have evolved their intuitive centers of mind sufficiently enough to perceive and understand from the higher reality of an enlightened mind, this potential of man that is portrayed as a gift, is indeed the long ignored wisdom expressed by both Einstein, the Apostle Paul, and the biblical authors.
Both of these statements which are ignored by the vast majority of scientists and their religious counterparts, ignore the underlying reality that not only does the unseen dimension of what we see exist, but that it is within the scope of man’s innate abilities to develop this facility of mind that enables the individual to perceive an unseen reality that is beyond the limits of man’s undeveloped physical organic senses. And with respect to the invisible, when it is understood that what is being made reference to is a blindness that encompasses all of mankind in a condition that Jesus portrayed as the “outer darkness” of mind and being (see Outer Darkness) — which is parallel to the analogy of the illusions of Plato’s Cavethat has entrapped mankind in a world that he does not understand the nature and reality of, then the reality of these words spoken by both the scientist and the mystic becomes an obstacle that is imperative to overcome and prevail over its limitations.
The vast difference between what would be called the knowledge of man, and the higher spiritual reality portrayed in the Knowledge that is defined as Gnosis, has begun to be demonstrated by the modern scientific community. Quoting physicist Walter Thirring in his book, Urbausteine der Materie where he wrote about matter that modern physics “…has put our thinking about the essence of matter in a different context. It has taken our gaze from the visible – the particles – to the underlying entity, the field. The presence of matter is merely a disturbance of the perfect state of the field at that place; something accidental, one could almost say, a ‘blemish’. Accordingly, there are no simple laws describing the forces between elementary particles… Order and symmetry must be sought in the underlying field.” One of the primary realities that science has to come to terms with in order to advance beyond their present level, is the fact that physical matter is the result of the forces in the Etheric Field coming together, causing what Walter Thirring above describes as a “blemish”that we observe with our organic physical senses. And what this is, is Darwinism in reverse — i.e., modern science has proven that the Field which is unseen and surrounds all matter, is the Source which impresses the aspect of mind and consciousness which is represented in the form of matter that we observe. The problem is that to the organic mind of both the faith-based believer, as well as the Atheist, what modern science has proven is simply beyond their ability to even contemplate.
What man calls knowledge, is the wisdom and understanding gained through his study of what Walter Thirring called the “blemish” — i.e., the illusion of what we perceive as physical matter. Yet, without understanding the underlying forces in the Field that formed the blemish that organic man observes as concrete physical matter, it can be stated that what we observe in the physical world is so incomplete, that it would be virtually impossible to truly understand what we think and imagine we see. Reality, states the physicist, can only be found in the (Etheric) Field — and it is the Field that both surrounds all physical forms that we observe with our body-senses, and it is the unseen Field that is the source of what we perceive with our physical senses which we call matter. Which again, is reverse Darwinism — in that, Darwinism attempted to demonstrate that this physical world came into being apart from any unseen supernatural forces — and modern science has now proven that this world is the direct result of unseen forces that would be defined as supernatural, or beyond what is seen with the physical senses.
In defense of Darwin, it must be understood that in the same way that many unsolved crimes in the past are presently resolved through DNA, Darwin lived in the nineteenth century — long before the most enlightening discoveries of modern quantum physics. And in recognition of this fact, Darwin himself questioned the inadequacy of his own conclusions. In the words of Niles Eldredge of the American Museum of Natural History: “The old explanation that the fossil record was inadequate is in itself an inadequate explanation.” Why? The fossil record is inadequate because everything that we see and perceive in this realm is directly caused by patterns of force being exerted upon matter from beyond the bounds of this three-dimensional world in which we presently dwell. And the fact that the fossil record failed to support Darwin’s conclusions, is openly acknowledged in his own words where he wrote: “Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain, and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest objection which can be urged against my theory” (Charles Darwin, On The Origin Of Species). According to Darwin’s theory, the geological record should be full of species that are slowly increasing in complexity over time. Since evolution relies on time, chance, and incremental steps, sudden leaps are not possible — which demonstrates that the fossil record itself directly contradicts the theory of evolution! And even if a proverbial missing link could be found, this would not in any manner negate the fact that it is the forces in the Etheric Field that has brought about all changes and variations of life-forms that we observe in the physical world.
Einstein experienced shock when he first came into contact with the new reality of atomic physics, and wrote in his autobiography: “All my attempts to adapt the theoretical foundation of physics to this [new type of] knowledge failed completely. It was as if the ground had been pulled out from under one, with no firm foundation to be seen anywhere, upon which one could have built”. In much the same fashion, the European physicist Niels Bohr stated that “…The great extension of our experience in recent years has brought to light the insufficiency of our simple mechanical conceptions and, as a consequence, has shaken the foundation on which the customary interpretation of observation was based.” These “…mechanical conceptions” make reference to Darwin and the theory of evolution.
In the same way that Peter warned that organic man only sees in the scriptures what he is predisposed to already believe, it is also true that man perceives all of Creation through the filter of his beliefs about life. The believer is in no manner dependent upon facts, and no amount of facts can deter the unbeliever — i.e., most of mankind is totally predisposed to see only what they already believe to be true. And while many will become both offended and simply dismiss the statement of the Apostle Peter in the Homilies that men see and understand only what they are programmed to perceive by virtue of the filter of their beliefs — or, the Organic Laws of the earth that predisposes them to a specific preordained opinion — the text of Itzhak Bentov’s book itself reveals that: “The quantum theory asserts that there is no way one can measure some sets of things, like momentum and position, together very accurately… because the consciousness of the experimenter interacts with the experiment itself. Therefore, it becomes possible that the attitude of the experimenter must also influence the outcome of any particular experiment” (Preface to Stalking The Wild Pendulum, by Itzhak Bentov). Thus, we begin to contemplate the interrelatedness of mind and matter and the fact that our whole politically correct culture has become an obstacle to the advancement of mankind. And since the vast majority of religious doctrines of belief are merely what was deemed politically correct in past cultures, few people are even capable of seeing beyond the limits of the facade of their predisposed beliefs. In the very narrow linear perception of the “fossilized” world-view that is taught in science class in our schools today, the idea that the mind of the experimenter can impact the results of the experiment itself, is simply beyond the scope of man’s cultural understanding.
If, as presupposed by the science of man’s past, everything man sees is a detached, stand-alone, separate inanimate object, then genuinely intelligent men must recognize that in his present cultural world view, there is a great void in their understanding that inhibits them from even contemplating how the mind of a person can affect the outcome of a given experiment? And thus, what the Apostle Peter warns with respect to his statement that each person who reads the scriptures only sees what he he predisposed to see, modern quantum mechanics has gone beyond this fact, and proven that the mindset and thinking of a scientific investigator, can somehow impact his findings and results. Not only does this throw all of man’s analytical conclusions into question, but it must be realized that even the findings of Darwin was subject to the filter of his Unitarian mindset and beliefs. Moreover, this resolves the dilemma of why different men see and understand the same thing not only differently, but often from an opposite and conflicting perspective. Which one is wrong? What if each is seeing a fragmentary truth — and while neither is all wrong, there is still a greater reality that is beyond the comprehension of both conflicting viewpoints.
That there is an unseen connection between mind and matter, and man is able to consciously and unconsciously effect what we perceive as inanimate objects with his own patterns of thought, means that our present-day cultural and quasi-scientific perception of Creation itself is defective. Moreover, when we attempt to interpret the scriptures through the filter of our flawed vision and predisposed inherent understanding, it is impossible for us to even begin to perceive the true depth and revelation of the Word of God! The problem is that we can never start to embrace man’s true reality, until we begin to acknowledge and recognize that what we see is only a fragment of the whole picture of any given object — and this is true not only from a religious doctrinal perspective, but a scientific one as well.
Robert Jastrow, an astrophysicist who heads NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, pointed out that the big bang is not exactly an explanation of cause. He is quoted in The Aquarian Conspiracy: “If a scientist really examines the implications, he would be traumatized. As usual, when the mind is faced with trauma, it reacts by ignoring the implications – in science this is called ‘refusing to speculate’ – or by trivializing the origin of the world by calling it the Big Bang, as if the universe were merely a firecracker”. Mr. Jastrow then continues and states: “Consider the enormousness of the problem: Science has proved that the universe exploded into being at a certain moment. It asks, what cause produced this effect? Who or what put the matter and energy into the universe? Was the universe created out of nothing or was it gathered together out of pre-existing materials? And science cannot answer these questions… It is not a matter of another year, another decade of work, another measurement, or another theory. At this moment it seems as though science will never be able to raise the curtain on the mystery of creation”.
In the realization that traditional scientific inquiry can never provide the answers to life, thoughtful physicists in greater number have begun to notice the curious parallels between their own findings and ancient mystical descriptions of reality — mystical descriptions that have been totally dismissed by our modern culture. These similarities were pointed out in the book, The Tao Of Physics, by Fritjof Capra, and The Dancing Wu Li Masters by Gary Zukav. Zukav’s book takes its title from the Chinese expression for physics, wu li, which he translates as “patterns of organic energy”, and writes: “Bell’s theorem not only suggests that the world is quite different than it seems, it demands it. Something very exciting is happening. Physicists have ‘proved’ rationally that our rational ideas about the world in which we live are profoundly deficient”.
Bell’s theorem, which was proposed in 1964 by J.S. Bell, a physicist working in Switzerland, was first confirmed experimentally in 1972. Physicist Henry Stapp, in a 1975 federal report called it the most “profound discovery of science”. Bell’s theorem succeeds in exhibiting the bizarre nature of the subatomic world. Experiments show that if paired particles which are identical twins in their polarity fly apart, and the polarity of one is changed by an experimenter, the polarity of the other particle changes instantaneously. Thus, even though from a physical perspective the two particles appear to us as separate, it has been proven that the particles remain mysteriously connected regardless of the fact that there is no physical connection.
The esoteric reality that was proven and demonstrated in this experiment was portrayed as the most “profound discovery of science”, because it virtually proves everything that science presents in the classrooms throughout our educational systems today as being in profound error! Moreover — and perhaps even more important — is the fact that because we culturally build the child’s thinking and mindset upon a fraudulent foundation, we inhibit their evolving minds from moving beyond a very counterfeit point in their perception of both themselves, and the world in which they presently dwell. Further, the only explanation that the flat-earth scientists who remain in denial of the implications refuse to acknowledge, is that the particles are connected in another non-physical dimension that is beyond man’s organic vision to detect — i.e., what in the above is portrayed as the Field. In the words of Einstein: “We may therefore regard matter as being constituted by the regions of space in which the field is extremely intense… There is no place in this new kind of physics both for the field and matter, for the field is the only reality” (quoted in M. Capek, The Philosophical Impact of Contemporary Physics). What this confirms is that reality is in the Field that is beyond the organic vision and senses of man — and the physical world we perceive and interact with, is not only a result of this higher reality that we can’t see with our physical eyes, but in many instances is an illusion that is controlled by our predisposed beliefs and philosophical opinions. Moreover, what this further confirms is that the Darwinist mindset that is presently taught in our schools is not only gravely wrong, but the error which our educational systems is programming young school children with, represents a vision and thought pattern that will inhibit them from understanding man’s own higher reality that is manifest in the Field — or the Etheric realms that the organic senses of the body cannot normally detect. And herein lies the crux of the problem as seen in the example of our educational systems which will promote grave error — as seen in the fact that they present a totally false picture of both themselves, and the world — totally failing to convey to the students that it has already been proven that the mind of man in it’s natural organic state is simply incapable of perceiving the far-reaching ramifications of man’s higher reality of mind that is centered in the Etheric Field — and even less prepared to comprehend the results of the intertwining connections that are maintained not only between individuals and groups of people, but between the past, the present, and future. What is portrayed in the above is merely science beginning to crack open the door to man’s own higher reality — a reality that he can only begin to grasp, by discarding almost everything that he presently thinks he knows.
The Cruel Hoax: While it has been proven that the source of matter is in the Etheric Field beyond our organic vision — and that in the subatomic world, what appears to our senses is connected in a dimension that we can’t see with our organic vision — the fact that we continue to program and imbue our school children with this gravely flawed mindset that modern quantum physics has proven to be little more than junk science — means that we are predetermining the child’s failure to make any real progress in this life. And that our modern culture is predetermining the failure of the child, is the reason why in many of my writings I portray this process which we call education, as the (spiritual) abortion of those children who escape the abortionist who tears the fetus from it’s mother’s womb.